Diamond Shapes,
Drawn to Scale
Select a carat weight and see all six major cuts side by side, exactly as they compare in size. Dimensions shown are real-world averages for each shape at that weight.
Round Brilliant
6.5mmMaximum brilliance. The timeless benchmark.
Oval
7.7 x 5.7mmAppears larger than round. Elongates the finger.
Cushion
5.5 x 5.5mmSoft corners. Favoured in vintage-style settings.
Emerald Cut
6.5 x 4.5mmStep-cut facets. Less sparkle, more depth. Architectural.
Pear
8.0 x 5.0mmPoints toward the nail. Very elongating on the hand.
Marquise
10.0 x 5.0mmThe longest shape. Maximum visual coverage on the finger.
Dimensions shown are real-world averages. Actual stones vary slightly depending on depth and proportions. At equal carat weight, shapes with shallower depths (oval, pear, marquise) appear larger face-up because more of the weight is spread across the surface rather than lost to depth.
Cut Character Guide
Round Brilliant
The 58-facet round brilliant is engineered for maximum light return. When cut to Excellent grade, it outperforms every other shape on raw brilliance. It is also the easiest to set, the most widely available, and the most straightforward to compare across jewellers. The premium: rounds carry a cut premium over fancy shapes. Expect to pay 10–15% more per carat versus an oval of equivalent grade.
Oval
An oval of 1ct typically shows more surface area than a round of 1ct, because more of its weight sits in the face-up plane rather than depth. It elongates the finger significantly. Watch for: the "bow-tie effect", a dark shadow across the centre of some ovals caused by light leakage. Always view in normal light before buying, not just under a jeweller's spotlight.
Cushion
A softer, more romantic shape that sits lower on the finger than a round. Cushions come in two variants: standard (more sparkle, larger facets) and modified cushion brilliant (crushed-ice look, very popular). Best in: halo settings, vintage-inspired designs, and yellow gold. Slightly smaller face-up than round at equal carat weight.
Emerald Cut
The step-cut facets of an emerald create long flashes of light rather than sparkle, a fundamentally different look from brilliant-cut stones. The trade-off is that inclusions are more visible, so clarity grade matters more here than in any other shape. Buy at: VS2 minimum, ideally VS1. The result, when the stone is clean, is extraordinarily elegant.
Pear
One of the most elongating shapes on the finger. Traditionally worn with the point facing the nail; some wear it pointing toward the hand. Both are correct. Symmetry matters: the two sides of the curved end should be mirror images. An asymmetric pear is noticeable and undesirable. Check the outline carefully before buying.
Marquise
The longest shape in the standard repertoire, and the one that creates the most dramatic elongation on the finger. Face-up coverage per carat is the highest of any common shape. The caveat: the pointed tips are structurally vulnerable and need to be set in protective V-shaped prongs. Also susceptible to the bow-tie effect. Inspect in normal light.
Useful next steps
Understanding the 4Cs
How cut, colour, clarity and carat interact, and which to prioritise at your budget.
Read guide → ToolWhat Style Would She Love?
Six questions. A personalised style profile and jeweller shortlist.
Take the quiz → PracticalSetting a Budget
What different price points realistically buy you across London's market.
Read guide →